Taxi Owners Don’t Get A Bailout Because They Can’t Compete With Uber, Federal Court Rules


Every once in a while, in a great while, a bit of sanity shines through.

(From Forbes)

In a pair of wins for drivers in Chicago and Milwaukee, a federal court ruled that taxi owners have no right to block competitors and are not entitled to a bailout. This also marks the first time a federal appellate court has ruled in favor of ride-hailing.

The first case involved Uber and Lyft competing with taxi companies in Chicago, which have long benefited from a government-backed monopoly. As recently as 2013, a medallion to lease or own a Chicago taxi could fetch almost $360,000. But in 2016, a medallion sold for just over $66,000 on average. The slump in medallion transactions has been even starker: 14 medallions were sold last year, down from 91 sales in 2014 and 370 in 2013.

Those drops reflect plummeting demand: In 2016, the number of taxi rides had plunged by 3.3 million, a drop of 23% from the previous year. As one alderman put it, “Now you can’t give a medallion away.”

It should be noted that at the dawn of ride sharing in Chicago the taxi union threatened to “out” any gay aldermen who voted to allow Uber.

Click here for the article.