California Dems’ hard-left turn could be the whole party’s future

Both of these are official propaganda. Also when did Hillary ever look like this?

 

 

When I was in high school I remember an elder explaining to me that the Communist Party in the US advised Communists who were interesting in politics to run as Democrats. I remember also my “liberal” (but very skilled) civics teacher explaining to me that that wasn’t the case.

In college of course I learned that this was in fact the case. At least in some parts of the country.

By the way former CIA director Brennan voted for the commie candidate for president in 1976. Which, I’m sorry, is crazy.

Image:@JamesWoods

 

I wonder why Buzzfeed is so hard on Trump? Perhaps because it is edited by a communist. That might be it. Could be.

Fight these control freaks.

(From The New York Post)

The first sign of lunacy was the delegates’ refusal to endorse impeccably liberal Sen. Dianne Feinstein. 

She lost out by 37 percent to 54 percent to Kevin de Leon, president pro tempore of the state Senate, who promises mainly to be obsessively anti-Trump.

Similarly, the delegates put former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa last among the party’s four candidates for governor — even though he’s tied in polls of Democratic voters with former San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom, who came out on top at the convention.

Villaraigosa’s sin? As mayor, he supported charter schools and jousted with the teachers unions, rightly calling them “the largest obstacle to creating quality schools.”

The teachers unions incidentally are about the teachers and indoctrination, not the education of students primarily. Can you imagine some of the nonsense being taught in California schools these days? The place is descending quickly into sub-First World status.

Click here for the article.