Jeff Sessions Wants Police to Use Stop and Frisk Without Reasonable Suspicion

Nope. Sorry. Can’t do that. Not in the USA. The police must have probable cause.

(From ACLU.org)

The ACLU of Illinois did not sue the Chicago Police Department. A lawsuit was not necessary. It wrote a report, backed up by the department’s own data, demonstrating that its stop-and-frisk policy was unconstitutional and ineffective. The policy was characterized by random stops conducted under circumstances where there was no reasonable suspicion that any criminal activity was occurring or had occurred with respect to the person or people being stopped.

Chicagoans under this policy were stopped more than four times as much as New Yorkers before New York altered its stop-and-frisk practices. In 2014, more than 700,000 stops in Chicago did not result in a person being charged with a crime. There were a total of 129,166 arrests that year.

Even if one assumes all arrests in 2014 were done during a stop-and-frisk encounter — rather than, say, based on detective work, on-view crimes, or 911 calls — more than 84 percent of the stops were of completely innocent people.

I really wish the ACLU hadn’t gone all wussy on free speech recently. We’d be more inclined to give them some digital ink.

Also why don’t we stop stop and frisk at the airports too while we’re at it?

Click here for the article.